22.-23. May 2000
CEA - Grenoble
France
Report
kick-off
meeting
‘Low-energy
ion beam facilities’
HPRI-CT-1999-40012
Report structure:
II) Characterisation of the
infrastructures and the user-experience
III) Discussion of individual
projects
IV) Importance of multiply
charged ions in related fields
V) Meeting of the network management board (NMB)
VI) Annex
a)
List of participants
b)
Programme of the meeting
c)
Structure of the 5. Framework Programme
d)
Overview on relevant network dates
I)
Introductory remarks
This
report is thought to keep all participants of the network informed on the
common activities and particularly on the subjects which have been discussed
during the 2-day kick-off meeting in Grenoble. It should help to create new
ideas among the network members and to trigger personnel initiatives in
starting up our work. On the other hand it will give the European Commission
the opportunity to follow the starting activities in our network.
It was the main objective of the LEIF kick-off
meeting,
n to improve the information flow among the participants concerning the
different infrastructures, actually associated in the network, as well as to
describe the projects of the different participating groups,
n to recall and clarify the projects and the aims of the network which we
have defined in our proposal,
n to discuss the methods and measures which we should apply in the near
future in order to improve the communication between users and infrastructures
and to initiate fruitful and effective collaborations between different
research teams,
n and to analyse which initiatives we have to take in order to activate
our field and closely related fields and to arrive finally, on a long term
scale, at the creation of a ‘virtual large-scale facility’.
Starting out from these ideas, the two days
have been organised in 4 sections :
Monday
morning : Characterisation of
the infrastructures and of the user-
experience of the representatives
Monday
afternoon : Discussion of the
individual network projects,
Tuesday
morning : Possible
applications of multiply charged, low-energetic ions,
Tuesday
afternoon : Conclusions and decisions
within the NMB meeting.
Corresponding to a working meeting the average number of representatives of each group was limited to about two participants in order to allow for an active and lively discussion, which was only disturbed during the second day by a fire alarm exercise. About half of the participating scientists are younger colleagues, a fraction which is encouraging but which still should be increased during the upcoming meetings and working visits. During this first meeting the time schedule was rather tight and we should try in future meetings to allow for more time to discuss the different subjects.
At
this occasion I would like to thank all participants for their constructive
cooperation and good will to start this project.
Grenoble,
Juin 2000 B.A.
Huber
(coordinator
of the network)
Characterisation of the infrastructures and the
user-experience
After
a short recall of the aims and a brief description of the actual status of the
network LEIF, the characteristic features of the involved infrastructures have
been presented. It was our aim to increase the knowledge among the participants
about the existing instrumentation like ion sources, beam lines, etc. , but also about the organisation of the
beam distribution, the existence of steering committees and collaborations and
finally the type of experiments which are performed at the different places.
The
presentation showed that the actual instrumentation of the 8 infrastructures is
highly complementary: A wide range of different ion sources, like ECR, EBIS,
Electrospray-IS, and other more conventional ion sources is available which can
deliver ion beams of different nature in different energy regimes. Furthermore,
a large variety of experimental tools, like storage rings, traps and high
resolution X-ray or Auger-spectroscopy, translational energy gain spectroscopy
or high-resolution mass spectrometry can be used and shared with users within
the collaborations. A preliminary list, characterising the different
infrastructures and the ongoing activities, is given below. More detailed
information will be elaborated within the next months in the projects I and II
of the network.
Concerning
the organisation and realisation of the beam time distribution, the situation
is more disperse. Whereas some infrastructures organise their beam time by
personnel initiatives and in form of collaborations, other infrastructures do
have user or programme committees, which are demanded by their financing
agencies and which cannot be replaced immediately by one central
LEIF-committee. This point, which is rather important within the network needs
further ideas and initiatives, and different solutions and propositions have to
be discussed during the next years in order to arrive at a common structure and
management within the LEIF participants.
Examples given by the user representatives showed that in several cases infrastructures outside of Europe (USA, Japan) are used for performing the experiments. This is very often due to existing collaborations with non-European groups, however, in some cases it is the higher performance of these infrastructures (for example higher charge states or more intensity of the ion beam) which causes this transfer. As a consequence, it must be one of our objectives to stay or to arrive at the leading edge of the technological development. This is possible only by a close collaboration within the network and a strong interaction with the experts in the corresponding fields.
Characterisation
of the participating groups
|
participant (infrastructure) |
sources
and beam
lines |
physicists
and technicians |
users
/ collaborations |
committee |
beam
time distribution |
projects |
|
CEA-Grenoble |
ECR (14.5 GHz); 5 beam lines ; 1-20 keV/q ; beams of C60q+ |
6 |
internal users 4 collaborations 5 external users |
‘Commitee de l’experience’ |
35-40 weeks/ year |
ion/cluster collisions ; fullerene/fullerene collisions ; Coulomb instability |
|
HMI-Berlin |
Hypernanogun ECR (14.5 GHz) 4 beam lines low energy: 1eV - 15 keV/q |
6 |
5 groups |
user-committee |
|
ion/surface collisions, plasmon excitation ; STM/AFM - work |
|
JLU-Giessen |
ECR-sources 2.5/5/10/14 GHz, beams of C60q+ and C60,70,84- |
|
internal users, collaborations, 1 external group |
no committee |
|
ion/ion collisions, electron impact ionisation, total cross sections and angular
distributions |
|
KVI-Groningen |
ECR (14 GHz), deceleration, 5 eV/amu |
|
internal users, collaborations |
no committee |
50 weeks |
collisions with atoms, molecules and
surfaces, biomolecules, magnetised surfaces, MOT experiment |
|
MSL-Stockholm |
MINIS, CRYSIS,ECR (14.5 GHz) storage ring, beams of molecular ions metastable ions |
|
internal users, collaborations, external users |
programme committee |
50 % of available time for low-energy experiments |
ion collisions with atoms, clusters, surfaces ; laser spectroscopy, SMILE-trap - precise mass spectrometry |
|
QUB-Belfast |
GIEBEL I and II (ECR) ; floating beam line metastable ions, cooled H-target |
|
internal users, guests |
no committee |
|
state-selective electron capture, electron-ion excitation, ion / surface interaction |
|
TUW |
ECR (2.45 / 5 GHz) 2
beam lines |
|
internal users, collaborations |
no committee |
|
ion/surface interaction : sputtering,
ion-induced electron emission, translational spectrometry |
|
UAA-Aarhus |
ESI, EBIS storage rings ELISA and ASTRID, Paul-trap, electro spray IS |
|
collaborations |
no committee |
50% of beam time is used for the ring ASTRID |
life time measurements, proteins, mass spectrometry needle fragmentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
user representatives |
|
facilities used in the past |
|
experimental projects | ||
|
ERIS-Paris |
|
Livermore-USA, Berkeley-USA, Caen-France, Grenoble-France |
|
ion/surface interaction : deceleration, surface
modification, X-ray spectroscopy, | ||
|
LFU-Innsbruck |
|
Wien, Austria |
|
2
sector-field mass spectrometry, collisions of electrons with atoms, molecules and
ions, fullerenes on surfaces, | ||
|
UBI-Bielefeld |
|
Groningen-Netherlands, Grenoble-France,
Darmstadt-Germany Tokyo, Riken-Japan |
|
Colombexplosion of small molecules, multihit detector, | ||
|
FRT-Heraklion |
|
Kansas-USA Frankfurt-Germany |
|
Zero-degree Auger spectroscopy, hemispherical spectrometer + PSD | ||
III) Discussion of individual projects
The persons who are in charge for the individual projects
summarised at the beginning the aims and the ideas which have been defined in
our proposal and they proposed possible lines along which we should try to
tackle the problems and to find adequate solutions. In the first two projects
(information, management and quality) direct actions are possible right away
concerning for example the construction of the main LEIF home-page and the links
to site- or project-specific web-pages or the organisation of a quality-meeting
in July 2000 in Grenoble. A common htmlect of the other projects is the necessity
to get a first overview on systems or methods which are actually applied at the
different sites of the network. In the following some details are given for the
6 projects.
Project 1 : Information policy (T.J.M. Zouros)
Concerning this project the following decisions have been
taken:
Implement a WWW address for the network
It is not possible to get as proposed
address, as it already belongs to someone else. However an alternate address
such as is still available. Better names might
also be proposed and discussed.
The name can be obtained from various international
organisations, but for its implementation a server has to be found. Accounts at
a private network company may allow for such a possibility. This is still under
investigation.
ii) Include a general e-mail button for sending e-mail to all
Leif members This will be
implemented as soon as the changes are made to the existing
web-page.
iii) Create a separate LEIF web-page for each network partner.
This page will describe the Leif partner; their
facility/infrastructure as far as it pertains to the LEIF network and the role
and projects of the particular partner is involved with in the LEIF network.
Eventually it will also link to the homepage of the specific laboratory or
institute.
This separate LEIF-pages will be prepared as soon as
special forms sent by e-mail to the representatives of each network partner for
completing have been returned.
Project 2 : Management and quality (H. Lebius)
It was agreed to define a common way to measure ion beam
currents which are available for the user in a standardised form. During the
discussion of the technical projects a versatile method to measure the current
with fixed beam diameter and divergence was found. A design of this Faraday cup
is currently underway, it will be distributed to the participants for
discussion. The different facilities agreed to publish their beam
characteristics on the LEIF web page. The actual beam currents will be replaced
by those measured with the standardised Faraday cup upon availability.
At the present stage, a centralised beam-time distribution
causes certain problems as some national laboratories are obliged by their
funding agencies to run a local committee. It was agreed upon to take a
step-by-step approach and to discuss different intermediate solutions, which
have to be clarified in future sub-meetings. However, the LEIF-web page is
supposed to be used as a central hub for information distribution, starting with
the performance figures of each infrastructure discussed above. It seems to be
premature to invoke centralised beam-time distribution already for the first
year in Berlin. However, a strong participation of the users will be needed to
discuss possible problems and solutions of a centralised distribution (trade
secrets etc.).
The date of the kick-off meeting had to be changed several
times due to the delay in signing the network contract by the European
Commission. Therefore it was not possible to schedule the quality courses (ISO
9000 and quality in research) for this meeting as being planned. They will be
held in Berlin instead. A preparation meeting with the tutors and the network
representatives participating in this specific project will be held the 7th of
July in Grenoble.
It was agreed upon to compile a list of possible
developments on the LEIF web-page. When this list reaches a ‘critical mass’, a
prioritisation will be made on a future network meeting.
Project 3 : On-line acces (Hp. Winter)
The principal goal of this sub-project is the design and
construction of LEIF - a virtual large research
facility for delivering low-energy ion beams of a
wide variety - by mutual connection of low-energy ion beam facilities and
experiments of the eight LEIF operators and of experiments of the four LEIF
users. Achievement of this ambitious goal will not only set a shining example in
the spirit of the „European Research Area“ which has been proposed by the EU
commission and is now discussed for its implementation in the 6. EU framework
programme and thereafter. In addition, LEIF will lend strong support to future
basic and applied research activities involving low-energy ion beams for various
scientific and technical fields, and existence of LEIF should definitely improve
the probability for obtaining future EU network project grants in related
research disciplines. The building-up of LEIF can be achieved in the following
four consecutive steps.
(a) Collection of all pertinent information regarding
low-energy ion beam facilities of the LEIF operators and other European groups,
and of competitive experimental activities and plans of LEIF operators and
-users. This information has to be provided in a way that its future
high-quality internet presentation will be facilitated. Furthermore, efficient
ways for fast communication and data transfer within LEIF will have to be
devised, including the setting-up of a common safety standard for respective
data access.
(b) Overview on the existing experimental control at LEIF
partners with the aim to devise and implement common standards for future
networking among all eight LEIF facilities and related experiments.
(c) Standardisation of experimental control and data-transfer
within LEIF, and demonstration of the feasibility to carry out common
experiments for different LEIF partners.
(d) Discussion of a future implementation of remote
experimental control within LEIF.
Project 4: Common tools and multi-coincidence
detectors (H.O.Lutz)
In the coordination meeting the following points have been
agreed upon:
-
The Bielefeld group will perform an enquete among the
network groups as to the status of detector use by the groups; this concerns the
type of detectors presently in use, the experimental requirements, plans for
future use of multi-coincidence detectors as well as required
specifications.
-
The Bielefeld group will collect information from the
network partners, the web, literature, etc. on multihit-detector systems
currently in use worldwide, with emphasis on low energy ion detection.
-
This information will be made available on the LEIF
homepage.
-
Regarding possible other common tools (e. g., a
multi-purpose chamber), there are at present no (parts of) equipments which can
readily be standardized (except of course those adressed by the other projects
1-3, 5, 6). Therefore, in project 4 emphasis will be given to detector
systems.
As a result of this action, a workshop on detector systems
may be organized in 2001, possibly together with project 5 (ion sources) and
project 6 (beam control). The plans will be made more concrete during the annual
meeting in Berlin (Oct. 20-22, 2000).
Pproject 5 :Ion beam production (P. Hvelplund)
At the kick-off meeting representatives of the involved
institutions reported on the present status of ion beam production in their
respective laboratories. It became clear that the electron cyclotron resonance
ion source (ECR) is the most widely used ion source within the network. This ion
source is ideal for the production of intense beams of highly charged atomic
ions. Some laboratories are using at present other, more specialized ion sources
in order to create ions in specified electronic states or to form ions of
clusters or large molecules.
The world-wide expertise concerning ECR ion sources is well
represented within the network, but as far as other ion sources are concerned it
would be advantageous to involve outside expertise in future initiatives.
It was decided to collect information about excisting ion
sources within the network,and to make a description of these ion sources
available for both operators and users. It was futher decided to make a
reference list to excisting ion source literature. This list should include both
original articles, review articles and conference procedings. We will also try
to collect catalogues from ion source manufactures, and distribute these among
the operators. Likevise a list of names of persons representing ion source
expertice from outside the network will be collected and distributed.
Initiatives to faciliate exchange of ion source know how
will be supported. This exchange of knowledge could be in the form of short term
exchange of post docs or technicians.
Finally it was decided to arrange a meeting,where
operators,users and invited experts will meet and discuss present and future
ways of ion beam production.
It is the intenstion of these initiatives to strengthen the
excisting research programs, at the individual laboratories,and to help to
support new initiatives conserning ions of clusters and biomolecules.
Project 6: Beam control and deceleration (R. Morgenstern)
Ion species, Intensity and Emittance:
An information page on the LEIF homepage which contains
information on beam properties such as ion species, beam energies, and intensity
will be set up. In first instance the most important quantity is beam current.
Because of different technical htmlects as e.g. extraction diaphragms and
voltages, and methods of measuring beam currents, the presently available
information on beam currents is often of limited use for the users. It is agreed
to give beam currents for ion beams collimated by two diaphragms in the 1-3 mm
range which are approximately 5 cm apart. This mimics typical beam entrance
optics of user set-ups. All operators (and users) will start supplying this kind
of standardized information.
Beam Energy:
Typically the ion sources are run at kV potentials to allow
for an efficient extraction and transportation of the ions. But many experiments
require eV beam energies. The lowest energy that can be obtained is defined by
the intrinsic energy spread of the primary beam. Typical values are in the
5-10xq eV range and depend strongly on the operation mode of the source. Linked
to the energy spread is the energy off set of the primary beam by the plasma
potential (values between 10 and 50xq V were reported). The actual amount of
information is still limited but most operators have the facilities to determine
the energy spreads and plasma potentials.
Beam purity:
Electronically pure (partially-stripped) ion beams, i.e.,
the fraction of metastable ions, can be pursued by different methods. Within
LEIF experience exists or is being built up with different methods to tune
fractions of electronically excited ions: double-translational energy
spectroscopy (Belfast and Grenoble), guiding and storing (Stockholm, Aarhus and
Groningen) and source operation (Vienna, Aarhus, Innsbruck and Belfast). Since
the physics aims of the users are different, most experiments require tailored
solutions. We plan to organize in the near future a workshop to make an
inventory of the physics objectives of users and potential users and the
corresponding experimental requirements.
IV) Importance of multiply charged ions in related
fields
Slow highly charged ions are very specific objects, which are highly
reactive when coming in contact with matter. This is mainly due to the large
amount of potential energy which is available in these systems and which may
easily cause collective phenomena, like multi-electron transfer or ionisation
processes or plasmon excitation etc. Therefore, these ions can play an important
role in different environments or can be used as powerful tools to prepare or to
modify other systems, which means, that they are interesting objects for
applications. Historically, there was always a strong link between the field of
highly charged ions and the field of plasma- or astrophysics. Especially after
the construction of efficient ion sources for highly charged ions( in the
1970th), many fusion-relevant cross sections
have been measured and diagnostic methods been developed. But also the
interaction with molecules, clusters or surfaces has been studied extensively,
in most cases with the aim to better understand the fundamental processes of the
interaction or mechanisms rather than to look for a possible direct application.
More recently, an increasing interest exists in evaluating
the potential of multiply charged ions in different fields of application. In
this spirit we tried within a short session to define the actual needs or
possibilities in neighboured fields, where the physics of highly charged ions
could provide essential contributions. The discussion was initiated by short
contributions scanning the fields of plasma- and astrophysics, surface physics,
the domain of molecules and bio-molecules, microelectronics and solids, or other
applications. Some of the main ideas and key-words can be summarised as
follows :
Plasma physics (fusion) :
Physics of the plasma edge region of fusion plasmas ;
Low energy collisions (for example Cq+, Nq+, Oq+ at 10 to 100 eV colliding with atoms,
molecules or surfaces) ;
Reliable data on the plasma density by neutral beam
diagnostics (Li, He, at 80 keV) ;
Low-Z and high-Z wall-materials (temperature) ;
Metastable electronically excited ion states ;
vibrationally excited hydrogen molecules ;
electron ion impact ionisation data ;
ion/ion data (heavy ion driven inertial fusion project
(HIDIF) or the estimation of losses in storage rings).
Astrophysics :
X-rays from comet tails ;
charge exchange with solar wind ;
interaction of solar wind with interstellar gas ;
collisions of highly charged ions with H20, CO2, CO, OH,
...
Surface physics :
Sputtering by highly charged ions ;
secondary ion emission ;
secondary electron yield and neutral particle emission ;
blister and track formation ;
surface cleaning and characterisation (ion microscope)
surface modification ;
nano-structuring by self-assembled monolayers ;
micro-capillaries.
(Bio)-molecules
formation of positive and negative ions of biomolecules
(proteins) ;
sequencing and high resolution mass spectrometry ;
‘needle fragmentation’ ;
matrix-assisted laser desorption (MALDI) ;
radiation damage ;
energy transfer in molecules (bio-sensors).
Other fields :
Determination of vapour pressures (C60);
treatment of materials by low energy ion implantation.
Most of the subjects have been illustrated by examples,
however, due to the lack of time, it was not possible, to discuss the different
phenomena in great detail. Therefore, we plan to select some of these topics for
a further and deeper discussion in near future, in order to concretise more
clearly possible applications.
In this respect, we will try to initiate a new Euresco
conference series (3. call for proposals is pending) dealing with the subject of
the potential and possible applications of highly charged ions in different
disciplines.
V) Decisions and recommendations of the network management
board
(NMB meeting)
In the following the points and subjects, which have been
discussed during the session of the network management board as well as the
corresponding decisions are summarised.
i) Scientific reporting :
In order to assist the coordinator in editing the report of
the kick-off meeting, the principal contractors who are responsible for one of
the six projects agreed to prepare a short summary (1/2 to 1 page) which
describes the planned activities in their project (aims at short term, result of
the discussion, activities planned in the near future,....). The coordinator
prefers to receive this document within the next two weeks in order to make the
general report available by end of June.
ii) Financial reporting :
A first cost statement has to be made at the 31.1.2001. The
principal contractors have to fill out the form E-2/B and send it to the
coordinator. Travel and subsistence costs shall be established on the basis of
the usual rules of the participant. For further details of the documentation of
costs see the articles 18 to 21 of the annex II as well as the cost estimation
forms (see general conditions).
In order to keep the coordinator informed about the
financial engagements taken by the different groups, the principal contractors
are asked to inform the coordinator by sending a short note, which gives a brief
statement on the type of activity, the project which is concerned as well as the
approximate amount of money involved.
iii) Documentation of ‘man-month’-values
In order to guarantee a good and effective documentation of
the time, which has been spent by different persons on different projects, the
principal contractors have to prepare an actual cumulative list, specifying the
approximate date, the person’s name, the concerned project, the task and the
estimated time (given in units of weeks).
iv) Individual projects
The different projects and the individual strategies have
been summarised by the responsible managers. A summary of the activities upon
which the NMB has agreed are given above in section III).
v) Annual meeting in Berlin
The length of the annual meeting has been fixed to 3 (or
2.5) days, the number of participants is expected to be ~ 40 - 50. The following
date has been proposed: 20.-22. of October 2000 (Friday to Sunday). The first
day should be devoted to administrative activities (lecture on quality,
reporting on different projects, NMB). During the other days the user projects
(internal users and invited external users) should be presented and key-lectures
in specific fields of ion/matter interaction should be given by invited experts.
For this purpose a list of users and experts has to be established.
vi) Situation of CEA-Grenoble
According to the actual internal perspectives of CEA, the
activities concerning the accelerator AIM at Grenoble will be transferred after
July 2001 to Ganil at Caen, in order to create there a strong low-energy
facility by combining the AIM-activities with those actually under development
at CIRIL. This transfer will not change or influence the programmes and projects
of the network LEIF.
vii) HCI - conference
The European Commission has agreed that the coordinator and
some of the principal contractors are allowed to finance the attendance of the
HCI-Conference in Berkeley this year by the network money. This is a unique and
exceptional decision, as the money has normally to be spent within Europe. The
EC has accepted the arguments that it is important to inform the community about
the aims of the newly formed network LEIF and that the HCI gives a excellent
chance to activate new clients working with ions or in closely related fields.
We decided to limit this possibility to less than one half of the participating
groups. We have agreed for the following cases:
CEA (B. Huber) ;
Berlin
(N. Stolterfoht)
Giessen
(R. Trassl)
Wien (F. Aumayr)
Bielefeld
(U. Werner)
viii) Euresco conference (3. call)
We discussed the possibility of proposing an Euresco Conference Series
concerning the ‘Potential of highly charged ions and their applications in
different fields (like microelectronics, plasma physics, material science,
biology,....)’. The 3. call concerns conferences for the year 2002 and after and
has to be proposed by 15.9.2000. About 30 proposals are likely to be accepted.
Candidates who would like to participate actively in such a project are asked to
contact the coordinator.
VI)
Annex
a) List of
participants
1
Bernd A. Huber
CEA-Grenoble
France
2
Henning Lebius
CEA-Grenoble
France
3
Nikolaus Stolterfoht
HMI-Berlin
Germany
4
Volker Hoffmann
HMI-Berlin
Germany
5
Erhard Salzborn
Justus Liebig Universitat
Giessen
Germany
6
Roland Trassl
Justus Liebig Universitat
Giessen
Germany
7
Ronnie Hoekstra
KVI-Groningen
Netherlands
8
Thomas Schlatholter
KVI-Groningen
Netherlands
9
Orjan Skeppstedt
MSL-Stockholm
Sweden
10 Karl G.
Rensfelt
MSL-Stockholm
Sweden
11 Henrik
Cederquist
Stockholm University
Sweden
12 Robert W.
McCullough
Queens University
Belfast
United Kingdom
13 Jason
Greenwood
Queens University
Belfast
United Kingdom
14
Hannspeter Winter
TU Wien
Austria
15 Friedrich
Aumayr
TU Wien
Austria
16 Hannes
Stockel
TU Wien
Austria
17 Preben
Hvelplund
University of Aarhus
Denmark
18 Soeren
Pape Moeller
University of Aarhus
Denmark
19 Tillman
Mark
Leopold Franzens
Universitat Innsbruck
Austria
20 Hans O.
Lutz
Universitat Bielefeld
Germany
21 Udo
Werner
Universitat Bielefeld
Germany
22 Carola
Haumann
Universitat Bielefeld
Germany
23 Theo J.M.
Zouros
Foundation for Research
and Technology Hellas
Greece
Remark :
Two
further colleagues
Paul Scheier
Leopold Franzens
Universitat Innsbruck
Austria
and
Gianni Giardino
Universite ParisVI
France
had to
cancel their participation in the last minute due to personnel reasons. Other
members of the groupe ERIS (Paris) have been excused, as they had to use
beamtime, attributed at the University of Berkeley, USA, for performing
ion/surface experiments during this week.
b) Programme of
the Kick-off meeting of the LEIF network
to be held 22./23. of May 2000
at the centre of CEA-Grenoble / France
Batiment B / annexe Doc centrale
Monday, 22.5.2000
900 Welcome
Status and structure of the network (general
information)
(B.A. Huber)
920 Presentation of the 8
infrastructures
(15 min / each : installation, sources, users, committee( _),
projects...)
Grenoble
(H. Lebius)
Berlin
(N. Stolterfoht)
Giessen
(E. Salzborn, R. Trassl)
Groningen
(R. Hoekstra)
Stockholm
(O. Skeppstedt)
1035 Coffee
1050
Belfast
(R. McCullough)
Wien
(F. Aumayr)
Aarhus
(P. Hvelplund)
1135
Using ion beam facilities
( ~ 10 min./ each user-representative : projects and
used facilities)
Innsbruck
(T. Mark)
Bielefeld
(H.O. Lutz)
Heraklion
(T. Zouros)
1215 - 1400 Lunch
1400
Discussion of individual projects
(main objectives, balance of the actual situation, possible
solutions, collaborations, meetings...)
1400
Information policy
(T. Zouros)
1440
Management and quality
(H. Lebius)
1530 Coffee
1550 On line
access
(Hp. Winter)
1630
Common tools and multi-coincidence detectors
(H.O. Lutz)
1730- 1830
Visit of the AIM-facility (aperitif)
2000 Dinner
Tuesday, 23.5.2000
830 Discussion of
individual projects (cont.)
830 Ion beam
production
(P. Hvelplund)
910 Ion beam
control and deceleration
(R. Hoekstra)
950 Application of
low-energy multiply charged ions
(round table discussion with contributions in the following fields)
ion / plasma
Hp. Winter, R. Hoekstra, E. Salzborn
R. McCullough, .......
astrophysics
J. Greenwood....
.
1030 - 1045 Coffee
ion / surface
F. Aumayr, Stolterfoht,
ion / biomolecules
P. Hvelplund, J. Greenwood,
H.O. Lutz,.....
low-energy implantation
H. Lebius, .....
others :
determination of vapour pressures H.
Cederquist, .....
carbon therapy, ion chemistry,........
1200 Technical meeting of
the NMB
(management of LEIF ; scientific and financial reporting ;
collaborations within individual projects ;
project meetings and annual LEIF - meetings ;
meeting 2000 in Berlin ; users and experts to be invited)
1330 - 1500 Lunch
1500
End of the kick-off meeting